>> It would be great if you could invest some time to bring this very >> useful feature into LilyPond! > > I'd love to work it into the codebase. I'm unsure though whether it > would be best to leave the TextSpanner engraver in C++ or replace it > with a Scheme engraver like this one.
My gut feeling says that spanners are not a time-critical thing in
LilyPond. Additionally, the general trend is to move to Scheme code,
so for me it would be OK to stay with a Scheme engraver.
Werner
