> On Wed, 13 May 2026 at 13:24, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: > > The principal problem I see is that Nicolas Sceaux has been an avid > > coder mainly active in the pre 2.14 LilyPond era with his own tools. > > That means that it is very unlikely this will end up a clean convert-ly > > It looks like Nicholas has kept his scores up to date so they should build > with > Lilypond version 2.24.0. There is a lot of custom code and even patches > to Lilypond itself involved though, so ymmv. > > >++++<<<<<-]>++++.+.++++.>+++++.>+.<<-.>>+.>++++.<<. > > +++.>-.<<++.>>----.<++.>>>++++++.<<<<.>>++++.<----.
This is not really a problem though. Nicolas has worked with his own toolchain, which is still fully reproducible. We can build the very exact same Lilypond version Nicolas has used (along with any patches required). As long as we don’t need to do major changes that is not much of an issue. Cheers, Tina
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
