Please explain. Maybe post the beginning of the thread, which seems to be
missing from the archives - or has a different subject line.
Thanks.
- Bruce
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Trevor Baca
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 4:49 PM
To: Han-Wen Nienhuys
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]; Nicolas Sceaux
Subject: Re: Music function arguments
On 12/14/05, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trevor Bača wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I agree, if for no other reason than to reduce the number of flips
> > over to the manual while inputting.
> >
> > Of course, it probably would be better for *everything* to be
> >
> > \command "arg"
> >
> > removing the kinda alien-looking (if you're not a scheme programmer)
>
> ACtually, this turned out to be trivial to do. I'm not sure why I
> didn't do it earlier.
Well hallelujah. This part of the peanut gallery says go for it before the
userbase gets any bigger (resulting in more backwards compatability
complaints).
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
