Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Paul Scott wrote:
You didn't tell us what version you are running. I believe there
have been times when raggedbottom hasn't been correct. I just tested
a 3 line example (with 'raggedbottom = ##t' in the paper block) with
2.7.33 and it worked perfectly. I have also found in the past that
if there are other errors in your code (Lilypond input) raggedbottom
gives undesired results.
with .33, I recommend using ragged-bottom iso. raggedbottom.
Thanks, Han-Wen. I saw the discussion but didn't have time to read it
carefully. I'll at least try to read the News more often.
Paul
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
