Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > a lot of properties are there just because it is awkward and more work > to put them on the C++ side. They're not all supposed to be useful.
Can we have an example of such a property? How about a naming convention for such properies, to indicate their uselessness/internal use? Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
