> It seems that the Turkish babel package redefines some symbol.
Yes, the `=' sign.
> However, I have no idea why we have that line in the generated code.
> If it's necessary, then we could just as well replace it by
> \makeatother (which is completely equivalent).
\makeatother doesn't exist for plain TeX, and the original code
produced by lilypond worked with both TeX and LaTeX. Whether it still
does I don't know...
> Werner, do you have any idea why we have the \catcode ... line in
> the generated code:
I no longer remember the details but it was necessary, obviously :-)
What about saying
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
instead? The `=' is just syntactical sugar and not needed. Does it
work then?
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
