On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 12:39:56PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > It might be nice to be able to > > write something like: > > > > <c e\noTie g\noTie bes>4~ <c e g bes> > > Hmm, much to type. What about the opposite: > <c~ e g bes~>4 <c e g bes> > This looks most natural to me. > Werner
Whatever seems better to Han-Wen and the developers. The reason I used the exclusion rather than inclusion approach (which notes of an otherwise tied chord should *not* be tied, instead of which notes of an otherwise untied chord *should* be tied) in my example, was because I thought someone might write the ambiguous-- <c~ e g bes~>4~ --but your example looks fine to me too. I merely suggested the functionality, and trust that Han-Wen and the developers with their knowledge of the logic and design principles of LilyPond would best know how to include such functionality. Steve _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
