Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Mats Bengtsson escreveu: > >> As already said, this is not available in the current manual and one >> problem is that >> this would still just tell a small part of the full syntax. Another > > This should be rather easy to add to the manual. I believe some of the > functions already have doc strings. It shouldn't be too hard to > extract them in dump them into the program reference. A neat task for > a scheme hacker... Nicolas?
OK, but don't hold your breath, I have but a few time at home. Maybe the usage documentation of the operators that are hard coded in the parser could be added to the automatically generated one, in order to have a full doc for keywords/functions. nicolas _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
