I tried the function and I don't see any incoherence using \tuplet instead
of \times in this situation. Maybe I don't understand the point well.
For me, I wouldn't mid at all to replace entirely the \times function by a
\tuplet function, giving both options of using a fraction (2/3) or the
engraved ratio (3:2).
Frédéric
2006/12/19, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>>> \tuplet 3:2 {...}
>>>
>>>
>> One minor detail is that the name isn't exactly appropriate when you
>> do
>> \set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4)
>> \times 2/3 {c8 d e f e d e f g f e d }
>>
>
> Well, in that case just stay with \times.
>
>
I thought the proposal was to completely get rid of \times and replace it
by \tuplet (which I think is a good idea). Just wanted to see if anybody
had any bright idea on a command name that's accurate also in this
special case.
/Mats
> Werner
>
--
=============================================
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
