On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (2) \times 2/3 and \tuplet 3:2 don't mean the same thing:
> \times 2/3 {c8 d e d e f}
> makes sense, but I don't think that
> \tuplet 3:2 {c8 d e d e f}
> does. The least messy option would be the status quo. The keyword
> \times is perfectly clear. You *could* keep \times and *add* the keyword
> \tuplet with the syntax \tuplet m:n {sequence-of-notes}, but then
> when the \tuplet expression is parsed, checks should be performed that
> would accept
> \tuplet 3:2 {c8 d e}
I definitely agree that \times x/y is the least messy option.
I use Lilypond since 1.4.12 (yes, that's a long time ago and, yes, I
suffered with the syntax change of brackets and slurs, among many other
- but it has been worthwhile) Since I started to learn Lilypond, I
thought \times one of the most clear and elegant parts of Lilypond,
concerning the x/y.
The very few times I confused it with \time - usually a typing error -
it was always one of those easy to find and fix problems.
I hope that this (\times x/y) does not change, but if it does, well, I
will live with it also....
Thanks to all for Lilypond and for the user- and devel- lists
Best regards,
Luise
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
