Cameron Horsburgh escreveu: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:09:39PM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > >> don't; -dlog-file=foo is the recommended method. -dseparate-log-files if >> you need multiple logs. > > I might have this wrong, but I have problems with each of these: > > lilypond -dlog-file=log foo.ly
Please file a bug. It's called foo.log, btw. > runs as expected, but no log is left, even if foo.ly contains errors. > > lilypond -dseparate-log-files foo.ly bar.ly > > also compiles cleanly, but I get a warning -- > > warning: no such internal option: separate-log-files > > and no log files. > > Thoughts? 2.11.x -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen LilyPond Software Design -- Code for Music Notation http://www.lilypond-design.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
