On 3/29/07, Andrea Valle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Mats. here's the mail starting the thread I'm referring to, and pointing to a previous and related one: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2006-08/msg00271.html Best -a- On 29 Mar 2007, at 09:16, Mats Bengtsson wrote: It would be much easier to realize exactly what you want to achieve if you included an example of the LilyPond code you use today (or at least provide an exact reference to some of the earlier emails you mention). /Mats Andrea Valle wrote: Hi to all, I'm experimenting what seems to be a common problem. I have to use glissandos connecting non adjacent notes, e.g. g4~g16 a8. . The common notation, and also the one suggested by Stone (p. 21), is to indicate the rhythm without noteheads. So, I'd like to have a straight line connect the g and the a and a headless note on the g16. I've searched thru the list, and see some (recent) posts related exactly to this topic. There was also a proposal for sponsoring. As I have been out of the list for a year, I'm not understanding the actual situation. 1. Is there a way to notate a glissando precisely in this way (avoiding the trick of using many glissandos connecting the composing notes)? 2. Is there (still) a sponsoring project for such a feature? In the case, I could participate. I saw something about 100 eu, if I understood clearly. 2b. What about sponsoring? Is it still active? It isn't clear to me from the usual page: http://lilypond.org/web/sponsor/options
Hi Andrea, Noncontiguous (or nonadjacent) glissandi haven't been implemented yet. If the opportunity is still open, I'll be happy to help sponsor. Trevor. -- Trevor Bača [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
