On Monday 23 April 2007 09:23, Graham Percival wrote: > Joe Neeman wrote: > > On Monday 23 April 2007 05:49, Maximilian Albert wrote: > >> Reinserting the above line manually in scm/define-grobs.scm and > >> comparing it with Mats' solution yields exactly the same result for > >> staves with brackets, but for ungrouped staves it does indeed look ugly. > >> > >> Is there an easy way to make this setting only work in the former case? > >> (Hm, probably not, otherwise it would probably already be implemented;)) > >> Of course, it's not a big deal to add the padding property manually to > >> each score if needed, but I think eventually lily should be able to > >> detect these cases itself. > > > > The solution for this is to use more accurate glyph outlines than > > bounding boxes. I hope to do this at some point, but it is non-trivial. > > What about giving a StaffGroup some width? I'm thinking of your recent > fix for #352. I mean, if there's a StaffGroup grob then we want the bar > numbers to be higher; if there's no StaffGroup grob then we don't want > to move the bar numbers.
The problem would be to make the StaffGroup have extra width but only for the BarLine (because we don't want to push anything else up). I think an easier solution might be to fiddle with SystemStartBar. But if Werner can work some metafont magic, I might be able to skip the quick solution and go straight to the good one... _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
