Well, in this example from the Regression tests it does. http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/input/regression/lily-dd43efc1a7.ly
And so it did in my score, which I actually have never seen before, so I found it quite strange not to have an accidental style which solves this. Actually I solved the problem myself later. I think I used '\override Accidental #'after-line-break = ##f'. Hmm, I just checked the same example from above in the regression tests of version 2.11 and the accidental is indeed not printed after the line break, although it says that it should. regards, Tao -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Datum: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 17:43:52 +0200 Von: "Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [email protected] Betreff: Re: tied note accidentals after line break > 2007/6/14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > hello, > > Hi Tao, > > sorry for not having answered sooner; the list is quiet today, so it > gives more time to look for unanswered posts. > > > is there a general way to prevent accidentals of tied notes from being > printed after a line break? > > I don't really understand what you're talking about; when I try the > following snippet the accidental is not printed again after the line > break. > > { c1 d e fis ~ \break fis2 g e 2 } > > Can you tell us more about it? > > Regards, > Valentin -- GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS. Alle Infos und kostenlose Anmeldung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freemail _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
