> Anybody still use the docs in info format?
I do, from time to time.
> If yes, do you want to see links to the music glossary? To see what
> I'm talking about, look in the Tutorial, 2.1.2 Simple notation.
>
> *****
> The easiest way to enter notes is by using `\relative' mode. In
> this mode, the *note ()interval::music-glossary
Uuh, those links doesn't work at all with standalone info 4.8 :-(
> Would you prefer
> 1) to keep the current ugly links?
Of course not because they don't work.
> 2) to suggest a new macro for @rglos{} that produces nicer links (if
> possible
Yes.
> 3) don't bother with links; just have
> @ifinfo
> @macro rgloss{TEXT}
> \TEXT\
> @end macro
> @endinfo
Hmm. I personally don't need links to the glossary, but other users
might have a different opinion.
Werner
PS: Even if standalone info is not the first choice, it sometimes
shows up formatting deficiencies because of the strict layout it
enforces to the original document. For this reason I would like
to have ongoing support for the plain info format -- and from time
to time I even apply corrections to get better output.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
