On 10/1/07, Eyolf Østrem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 01.10.2007 (16:16), Trevor Daniels wrote: > > Some comments on Pitches > > > - move Micro tones into Accidentals. > > > > No, too specialist. Should it be moved into Specialist > > notation? Wherever it is it needs a link to Other languages. > > I say yes, in accordance with the general principle that everything > that belongs together, should be together, no matter how advanced or > basic it is. > Also, the "specialist notation" section is for "specialized > areas of use" (guitar, piano, ancient, etc) rather than "very advanced > features that only 20th-c. music freaks will ever need" :-) > > BTW, I've been thinking about that title... I was trying to find the > section on vocal music, which ought to be easy enough, but it took me > a while to find it there, even though I knew it was there. I didn't > think of it as "specialist" in any way. I think "specialized notation" > would make it a little better, but I'm not sure.
FWIW, I'm not a fan of the specialist / nonspecialist distinction. All notation is specialist ... until you realize that you need it ... and then it suddenly becomes very ordinary. So I would put microtones right alongside the other accidentals. (So I vote with Eyolf.) -- Trevor Bača [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
