Eyolf Østrem wrote:
I made a last attempt, with minimal files included, which look like
this:
I'm now going to commit the sin of jumping into a long discussion
without having read the intermediate steps (with GDP going on, I've been
pretty much ignoring -user), so please ignore if this is totally off-base...
playground/book.tex:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\include{out/lpb-file}
\end{document}
playground/lpb-file.lytex:
\lilypondfile{music.ly}
... why? Just not stick
\lilypnodfile{out/music.ly
in your main book.tex? That's what I do. Call it book.lytex, run it
through lilypond-book, then run the generated .tex through texinfo. Or
pdflatex.
Now, is this how it's supposed to be, or is there a way to work around
this? As I said, I'm happy to keep all the output files in the main
folder -- now it's become almost a matter of principle: I want to find
out if I've overlooked something...
This is related to a current bug (or enhancement request) about
\includes in pure lilypond files. All the filenames are relative to the
first file called, not the first file. Err, the bug summary has a
better summary than this.
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
