On 19 Oct 2007, at 23:29, Graham Percival wrote:
I suspected that. - So it might be better putting at least the
more prominent examples in a special examples PDF, and reference
that. The LSR could still be there, for new examples that have not
yet worked up the hierarchy.
GDP is not on the main lilypond website. Please see our website here:
http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/
Thanks, I know that.
In particular, look at the "GDP docs" and the "policy.txt".
So what is "Music Glossary" and "Notation Reference" relative to the
names listed on:
http://opihi.cs.uvic.ca/~gperciva/lilypond/Documentation/index.html
I am not particularly interested in reopening any decisions that we
have already made. The division of manual into the learning
manual, user manual, and program usage is one of those decisions.
So then let's drop this discussion.
Finally, please change the subject line if you change the subject.
We have a lot of emails about GDP, and it quickly becomes much more
difficult to keep things straight if people change discussions
without modifying the subject line accordingly.
I guess I put into the context of GDP. It is hard for me to read you
mind.
I also brought forward the idea of a Wiki. These are great to put
silly little facts one does not know where to put elsewhere.
Abbreviations and such, for example.
Wikis are worse than useless. Please see previous discussions
about them on this list.
I am well aware of your particular opinion about the wikis. I use
them all the time, as well as netsearching. Even the UNIX
standardization team decided to set one up.
And LilyPond has the same steep learning curve problem as UNIX, as
noted before.
Hans Åberg
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
