On 10 Nov 2007, at 06:02, Graham Percival wrote:
PDF vs. HTML: pdf readers generally prefer to have consecutive
documentation, with few links. HTML readers generally prefer to
have links everywhere.
Those that produce both seem to choose a format that can produce both
automatically by some program. For example the texinfo format. But
that might unsuitable for LilyPond. So you might need you own format.
Stable docs vs. wiki: some people want an unchanging, complete,
finished set of docs, particularly if they print them out. Other
people like the constant flux of web 2.0 stuff.
These do different things. The docs should be designed to lower the
need ask questions on the lists, I think.
A wiki can in fact be used to replace the LilyPond site altogether.
One example is
http://haskell.org/
which nowadays expand to
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Haskell
So it is possibly the whole Haskell site. Once upon the time, the
Haskell wiki was a separate project.
Hans Åberg
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
