On 27.12.2007 22:17, Trevor Daniels wrote: > although this doesn't meet your objective of keeping the > parts distinct.
Yes, it is sad but true: there is no solution for this problem at the moment. The only hope seems to be that some volunteer writes a new partcombine implementation... Luc _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
