Mats Bengtsson schrieb:
till wrote:
Hi,
I just read a bit further in the GDP and saw this example about
polymetric
music where each note has still the same duration, so the barlines
won't be
on the same vertical position. Because Lilypond can't count the bars
anymore, it won't put bar numbers by default. This has to be done a
similar
way by removing the Bar_number_engraver from the score and putting it
into
the staves.
Honestly, what would the purpose be of such bar numbers? For rehearsals,
such bar numbers are useless, since they're different for each part,
so you
would need to rely on rehearsal marks instead.
I guess you are right. For one score I thought of using only the bar
numbers of the upper system, but I gave up and notated everything
conventionally, marking the different bars with accents.
Also, if you try to do the suggested change, you will notice that the
resulting bar
numbers collide with the left edge bracket/brace/bar line unless you
move them
further to the left.
Yes, but this seems so be also the case with normal numbers? Or is is
solved with 2.11?
What I thought migh make sense, would be to remove the bar number
engraver
from the Score context, but it turns out that no bar numbers are typeset
anyway
(probably since the bar numbering information isn't available at the
Score level),
so it's not necessary neither.
Yes, that's true, I guess, it is just decided that nothing should be
printed in case that there is no common numbering.
Greetings
Till
/Mats
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
