Since the section is going to describe the use of the 'direction property, why not call it that?
Choose one of: Direction property The direction property Use of the direction property As its use is so diverse we can't hope to capture all of them in the heading. Trevor D > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+t.daniels=treda.co.u > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Graham Percival > Sent: 18 February 2008 17:42 > To: Kieren MacMillan > Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org; Mats Bengtsson > Subject: Re: GDP: info about controlling > direciton / placement > > > On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:26:25 -0500 > Kieren MacMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > >> The advanced term is "grobs", but I'd rather > avoid that here. For > > >> some reason I prefer "controlling direction" > instead of > > >> "controlling placement", although I can't > give any reason for this. > > > > > I'm not fully convinced that everybody will > understand what > > > "directions" > > > refers to (can't a conductor give directions, > for example?). > > > > What about "controlling position"? > > If there's consensus about this, I'm happy with that. > > The original title was "Up and down", but I > thought that was silly. > Calling it "Controlling vertical > {direction/position}" might be > possible, but then it seems to exclude setting > the horizontal > position... although there are very few such > cases. (maybe fingering?) > > Cheers, > - Graham > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
