Hi Ralph I'd go for the simpler structure:
1.4 Repeats 1.4.1 Repeat syntax 1.4.2 Normal repeats 1.4.3 Manual repeat commands 1.4.4 Tremolo repeats 1.4.5 Measure repeats This puts the syntax at the front, as you wanted, and removes the ugly, somewhat artificial, separation into Writing repeats and Other repeats. Also removing a level is good. You could add "Writing" before headings 2-5, to distinguish them from the syntax section but I don't think that's necessary. Trevor D -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Palmer, Ralph Sent: 21 February 2008 21:04 To: [email protected] Subject: GDP: Repeats Hi, All - I'm currently working on rewriting Repeats in the Notation Reference, and I don't care for the existing structure. Currently, it looks like this: 1.4 Repeats 1.4.1 Writing repeats 1.4.1.1 Repeat syntax 1.4.1.2 Normal repeats 1.4.1.3 Manual repeat commands 1.4.2 Other repeats 1.4.2.1 Tremolo repeats 1.4.2.2 Measure repeats However, since Repeat syntax discusses the common syntax for all the repeats, it would seem to make more sense to take it out of the section dealing with normal. I'd like to suggest: 1.4 Repeats 1.4.1 Repeat syntax 1.4.1.1 Repeat syntax and types of repeats (introduction of the syntactic construct) (following types of repetition are supported . . .) 1.4.2 Writing repeats 1.4.2.1 Normal repeats (I'd prefer a better term than "normal") 1.4.2.2 Manual repeat commands 1.4.2.3 Tremolo repeats 1.4.2.4 Measure repeats It might also make sense to split 1.4.1.1 into 1.4.1.1 Repeat syntax, followed by 1.4.1.2 Types of repeats supported. Comments, please? Ralph _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
