Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 schrieb Carl D. Sorensen: > By way of standard practice, is it better to define > figuredBassStackingDirUpOff as an \override (which makes it absolute, but > keeps adding to the props list), or as a \revert, which undoes an override > and thus prevents the props list from continuing to grow, but may not have > the desired effet (i.e. if \revert is used, two *Ons followed by one *Off > will result in an *On remaining).
Really? I always thought that \revert would simply set the prop back to its default value (as opposed to undoing just the last override). Actually, I had wished several times that \override and \revert would simply work on a stack of settings, so that one can easily restore the previous setting. However, it doesn't work that way. Cheers, Reinhold -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Reinhold Kainhofer, Vienna University of Technology, Austria email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial and Actuarial Mathematics, TU Wien, http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/ * K Desktop Environment, http://www.kde.org, KOrganizer maintainer * Chorvereinigung "Jung-Wien", http://www.jung-wien.at/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
