This post from the archive solves the problem in Luis' third line of
code, but not the fourth. I've been fiddling with this for the last
half hour and can't make the fourth line beam the 16th notes as a single
group and still connect with the 8th note. Weird.
Jon
James E. Bailey wrote:
You might take a look at
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-05/msg00481.html
Am 09.06.2008 um 04:24 schrieb luis jure:
hello list,
sorry, i guess this must be in the docs somewhere, perhaps it has been
discussed in the list before, but i can't really find a solution...
when writing irregular 16th-note quintuplets (one 8th-note and three
16ths) i get incorrect beaming groups, depending where the 8th note is
placed
the first two tuplets (bar 1) are correct, but their mirrors (bar 2)
have their beams wrong (see attached image). here's the very simple
code:
\version "2.11.42"
\relative c'
{
\times 4/5 { f8 f16 f16 f16 } r4
\times 4/5 { f16 f8 f16 f16 } r4
\times 4/5 { f16 f16 f8 f16 } r4
\times 4/5 { f16 f16 f16 f8 } r4
}
\layout{ragged-right=##t}
thanks,
lj
<tuplet.png>_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
