Hi,
I'm now working on a extreme serious piece, the suite about the earthquake.
So I want my score to be very formal.
I don't know how the remove empty staff function works. I added rehearsal
marks only above piccolo and violin I parts, but I don't know whether the marks
will let the parts appear during their silence. If no, the rehearsal marks will
disappear from my score. I ever read the score of The Rite Of Sprin in braille.
The transcribe's note said that the rehearsal marks are above the top of the
score and also the topmost string part. If the marks disappear, how to add
marks to other staves? If the \mark command hasn't appear in a part before,
will the rehearsal number be correct when writing on them when they become the
topmost score and string staves?
To make things clear (I can't express this very clearly in English), here's
the thing I want:
\version 2.11.47"
pic = \relative c'' { R1*10 \mark \default | R1*20 %{ should I add a \mark
\default even though it will not appear? %} | }
fl = \relative c'' { R1*10 | c1 \mark \default %{ can it be [2]? %} | \repeat
unfold 19 { c1 } | }
cl = { R1*30 | }
..
vI = \relative c' { c1 \mark \default | R1*29 | }
vII = \relative c' { c1 | R1*29 | }
vl = \relative c' { R1*10 | c1 \mark \default | c1 | R1*18 | }
..
I also created a "marks" variable containing all rehearsal marks, and will
use it for printing parts:
marks = { s1*10 \mark \default | s1*20 \mark \default | }
Will the marks of this line mess up the irregular marks I wrote for producing
full score? And, if I wrote c1 \mark \default | R1*29, will the second mark
appear in bar 11 (part version)? Must I split rests into R1*9 | R1*20?
In full score, I also don't know when the line breaks, so if I add marks in
other lines before break, it will cause visual mistake. Can I use the Dynamic
context as in piano score with marks (and therefore not write marks at other
places) and then place it before piccolo and violin I? Will it disappear when
the below staff is empty? Must I create a alias staff context instead?
Sorry for troubling you so much, because I can't check these myself!
Sincerely
Haipeng
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
