Mark Knoop <mark <at> opus11.net> writes: > > Unfortunately not, although some people may know of workarounds. > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=391&q=include >
Mark, Thanks for your reply. I surely would love to have \includeRelative Until then I'll include several (sets of) includes, luckily the missing includes are ignored, causes large log-files though ;-) Is there a way to speed up the realization of this? Arno Rog _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
