2008/8/11 Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 21:03 -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>> It was my idea to have all the real code in the staff-symbol file, and
>> have staff-symbol-referencer just be a wrapper, ie.
>
> Makes sense to me. We'll end up with a smaller patch this way, too.
OK, how about this?
bool
Staff_symbol_referencer::on_line (Grob *me, int pos)
{
Grob *st = get_staff_symbol (me);
return st
? Staff_symbol::on_line (st, pos)
: Staff_symbol::on_line (me, pos);
}
Regards,
Neil
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
