Am 18.08.2008 um 19:53 schrieb Francisco Vila:
2008/8/18 James E. Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I realise it isn't at draft stage yet, but I thought I'd say that
there's a
slight inaccuracy in 1.5.3, \oneVoice doesn't put a voice into the
same
voice context before and after a temporary polyphonic passage, not
explicitly creating two new voices does that. \oneVoice just sets
the beams
and stems so that they go the direction they're supposed to. It's
the the
equivalent of setting \stemNeutral \beamNeutral \tieNeutral
\slurNeutral
\phrasingSlurNeutral and anything else that \voiceOne ...
\voiceFour sets to
#UP or #DOWN.
Then, please, could you clarify why the "this is my song" example
works as expected? I am more and more confused for moments.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
http://www.paconet.org
it's not that it doesn't work, like I said, it's a slight inaccuracy.
The voice that exists before and after a short polyphonic section is
going to be the same regardless of whether you use \oneVoice or not.
you could use \voiceThree after the polyphonic section, it's still the
same voice. The point to make clear (and I think a thorough reading of
the appropriate section in the learning manual actually does that), is
that if, in a short polyphonic section you only explicitly create one
voice (the second voice usually), then the voice that existed
previously is the first voice in the polyphonic section, so you can
carry a slur from a one-voice situation into a multi-voice situation,
or out again. So yes, it works, but \oneVoice has nothing to do with
it working.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
