Tom Cloyd-2 wrote: > > Well, the alternative is more verbiage about how things work - or excise > the example and leave it all rather terse. To me this is a clear case of > "a picture is worth a thousand words". Only it's an illustration, not a > picture, as it were. Too short to teach, but long enough to illustrate. >
Agree on the idea, but wikipedia is more a text encyclopedia, even if there are numerous images. The "example" section has no really introduction, it begins with syntax details. If you add a paragraph saying how much lilypond can do with few code, and few syntax explanations, maybe they will accept the example. The french page is nicely written, with no example. http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/LilyPond http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/LilyPond -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/wikipedia%3A-%22GNU-Lilypond%22-article-tp19157368p19160695.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
