Valentin wrote: > 2008/8/31 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Well, it is only recommended if you want to use lilypond-book > > in conjunction with latex to produce a document. In that > > case, it's pretty obvious to anybody that you need a tex > > distribution anyway. However, for the 99% of the users who > > don't use lilypond-book or only use it with other formats, > > there's no dependence.
> > Of course, if you are strict and > > say that you have a dependence even if it's only via a > > rarely used utility script, Are you saying that we are ready to dump lilypond-book? > > then there's a dependency. > > This might be a silly suggestion, but what about distributing lp-book > as a separate package? Is it too complex to handle and maintain? Why not hand it back to thoose who want to make a live-cd, they can use the GUB version or does that include tex? Or, install lilypond.deb ignoring dependancies, this might work: export PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin ln -s /bin/true /usr/local/bin/kpsewhich dpkg -i --force-depends lilypond.deb or dpkg -i --ignore-depends=tetex-bin,texlive-base lilypond.deb Regards, /Karl _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
