2008/9/6 Adam James Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Han-Wen, > > Thanks for the reply. The example I sent was actually a quite simplified > version of what I'm attempting to do; there is a real possibility that in my > actual scores I will cause the 64-bit 'long long' numbers to overflow as > well. As you mentioned yourself before, I think the airtight solution is to > use rationals or arbitrary precision.
Just to let you know, the next development release will have support for 64-bit rationals. I imagine arbitrary precision will have to wait for the next development cycle, since we're approaching the release of 2.12. Regards, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
