I agree with Mark (Knoop). > The 2s in the original make no sense, and > look as though they should be 3s (triplets).
I wonder, perhaps the composer just meant 3 eighth notes (as if there duplet brackets were removed entirely). Is there 1) a time signature, or 2) a recurring meter delineated by the dashed barlines, or 3) a comment on the performance to explain the idiosyncratic use of the tuplet numbers? In the absence of all 3, I'm of the opinion that this is just a typo, or careless notating. Using a conventional notation in an unconventional way without explanation... It's like I'm handing you a 20-dollar bill saying "here's the 30 dollars I owe you". It's not fair to the performer. Hope this helps, Mark (Polesky) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
