> > No, I think it's a bug in the font itself(!). The glyph names seem
> > to be a bit mangled; the name "N" is assigned to several
> > codepoints, including that I-with-dot-below. (If you look in the
> > ps file you can see that in the font definition.)
I really can't believe that. This is something which I have actually
never seen before. Can you send the font to me privately for further
investigation?
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
