David Picón Álvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > d''4*95/192 s4*1/192 a'4*95/192 s4*1/192 a4*95/192 s4*1/192 g4*95/192 > s4*1/192 f4*95/192 s4*1/192 e4*95/192 s4*1/192 d4*95/192 s4*1/192 > e4*95/192 s4*1/192 | > > I was looking at the source of the converter, and although I'm not > sure if I understand it very well, would reducing the clocks_per_1 > value make it more likely that the converter would ignore these > useless silences?
>From looking at the example, I'd use a small script to remove all 1/192 rests and /192 clutter, so the result would become: d''4 a'4 a4 g4 f4 e4 d4 e4 | A slightly more complex perl script could produce d''4*1/2 a'4*1/2 a4*1/2 g4*1/2 f4*1/2 e4*1/2 d4*1/2 e4*1/2 | if that's desirable. -- Johan _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
