On 12/12/08 7:12 AM, "Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> My experience was when implementing the Java-based LilyPond parser that this
> is actually useless. Ok, it helps in the first steps, but later I found out
> that using the original bison file is the best option.
>
No disagreement from me. But it does give an overview of what goes where,
in a relatively compact format.
I don't use it any more, which is why I haven't pushed any harder to get it
into the documentation.
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
