On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:00:21AM +0100, James E. Bailey wrote: > > Am 22.12.2008 um 20:57 schrieb Graham Percival: > >> I'll point out that half a dozen other people, including music >> professors, have asked him for clarification after reading that >> email. So my confusion is not just me being a jerk. > > Sorry, perhaps you didn't continue the email thread and read http:// > lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-12/msg00571.html > "The second part I want to transpose also for Trumpet, also in the key of > D, but a fourth lower." > > Or perhaps the email here > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-12/msg00602.html > "How much clearer can I make it? The questions are answered in the posts > right above the questions. A trumpet part in the key of D but notated a > fourth lower, still in the key of D, as described above."
Umm... yeah. The fact that he thinks this answers the question gives me *less* confidence that he knows what he's talking about. If he wanted it a perfect fourth lower, then \transpose does the job. And normally when somebody says "a fourth lower", they mean a perfect interval. If he wants it a variable fourth lower, then it's not doable without scheme. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
