On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 08:04:36AM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > > On 1/7/09 3:05 AM, "Graham Percival" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 06:47:17PM -0500, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > >> [However, I still consider it unfortunate that the shorthand construct > >> doesn't automagically work as it shouldS] > > > > I agree; this is IMO one of the two most common problems. Now, > > if only some Frog could investigate this matter... ;) > > Is it on the bug list?
Good point. I don't know, but I don't think so. Then again, I don't actually know what the problem is; my interest in polyphony is only slightly higher than my interest in lyrics. I just know that we've had a huge amount of confusion about this in the recent past. Thankfully the answer has almost always been "look at NR x.y something about polyphony", but when experiened users complain about this as well, I figured that there's a bug as well. To anybody who feels motiviated about this (I nominate Kieren; Carl definitely shouldn't do this) - search the lilypnod google tracker for this bug/missing feature - if it's not there, add it as a low-priority enhancement. Describe whatever you can, quote whoever you want, insert links to mailist archives on the web if it helps. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
