On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Graham Percival <[email protected]> wrote:
> As for LilyPond vs. Sibelius: if we do it, we should do it > objectively. One thing we might do in the new website is to have > examples of notation from the latest software (lilypond stable, > finale 20XY, sibelius 20AB, etc) and point out flaws in the > default output. We could then point out the ease (or not!) of > fixing said problems. It would be nice to update the finale 2003 comparison on lilypond.org; I hear Finale has improved since, but so has the lilypond output. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [email protected] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
