2009/4/28 Andrew Hawryluk <[email protected]>: > It would be nice if LilyPond could use proper super/sub-scripts when > they exist in a font, and substitute the scaled version when > necessary. A similar approach has been suggested for real small caps: > > http://www.nabble.com/high-quality-typesetting-within-lilypond-to20860197.html#a20874015 > > In this case, I think most high-end fonts store small caps as an > OpenType alternate to the normal alphabetic code points, rather than > as separate characters in extended Unicode land. > > Valentin, is this worth logging an enhancement in the issues list? > Perhaps as part of the whole question of high-quality typesetting?
I am willing to open as many requests as needed, but we need to keep things clear and separate. For instance, Pekka's suggestions do seem sensible to me, but maybe the super/sub-script is a different issue. Regards, Valentin _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
