2009/5/16 Marc Hohl <[email protected]>:
> Neil Puttock schrieb:
>>
> So can I use it as a callback for 'stencil? (see below)
Not for the broken spanners, since they haven't been created when the
stencil callback is evaluated.
> Hm, I didn't get any errors, and invisible ties are exactly the feature I
> need.
They only show up if the binary is compiled without optimisations:
/home/neil/Desktop/test.ly:24:17: warning: programming error: cyclic
dependency: calculation-in-progress encountered for #'stencil (Tie)
g8 g ~ g g
~ g g~ g g ~
> At first, I used
>
> \override Tie #'after-line-breaking = #tie::handle-tab-tie
>
> but I didn't quite understand the term "after-line-breaking", since
> tie::handle-tab-tie is
> called on _every_ tie. So I changed the call to
> \override Tie #'stencil = #tie::handle-tab-tie
>
> and found out that it works, too, and has the advantage not to write
> \override Tie #'stencil = ##f
>
> explicitly. But if this is a crude style, I won't apply it. On the other
> hand, when
> this offers a possibility to change the TabNoteHead stencil on the fly, it
> could be used.
It's malformed as a stencil callback, since it returns no stencil (or
even #f). It produces no ties as a side effect.
>
> Can I switch to another tablature format, according to
>
> \set tablatureFormat = #parenthesized-tab-format / which is not defined yet?
No, since you wouldn't be able to distinguish between the two
formatting functions based on the note events.
Regards,
Neil
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
