On Jul 11, 2009, at 1:02 AM, John Mandereau wrote:
2009/7/11 Tim McNamara <[email protected]>:
How about something like Drupal? Or do you not want to make
editing the Web
site that direct?
It's not in the culture of Lily authors and most current contributors,
and they are
too busy with other development issue to be willing to spend the
effort of discovering
it, but if somebody came and seriously offered to move (more
precisely organize
moving of) the web site to Drupal and maintain it, we could
consider it.\
Sorry, John, I meant to send that to the list and not to you
personally. I keep forgetting that the reply-to header is not set to
the list.
I will look into what's involved with this and, if it seems
reasonable, make a proposal. I've never set up a site with Drupal
but have used them from the client side. Seems like it ought to be a
reasonable option and would take some pressure off. OTOH it can
result in too many cooks in the kitchen, so that must be considered
as well.
I've managed a few Web sites back when I had a server here at home
and still have a defunct one out on the Web (http://
www.andreasenforcongress.org which will show you my KISS tendencies;
I've also got another at http:www/frostybobs.org but am having
trouble with GoDaddy's URL forwarding for some reason- it works for
the other site but not this one- so that site is 404 currently).
CSS is not my strong point, I'd have to refresh my knowledge on this.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
