Jay Hamilton wrote:
> I'd second the table idea, The link would be helpful or just a "see- LM
> 4.6.3" too.
'See LM 4.6.3' is already there, but a link would be nice. :-) Table of
note names I think definitely necessary.
I don't know what the general consensus is on these snippets, but they
illustrate core LP functionality, no? i.e. not user-developed tweaks
like the LSR. So it seems worthwhile to gradually build up the
available documentation on them until a more extensive description is
completed and can be incorporated into its own part of the docs.
Best wishes,
-- Joe
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
