On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 11:30:14PM +0200, Joseph Wakeling wrote: > Graham Percival wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 04:25:28PM +0200, Joseph Wakeling wrote: > >> GPL page: should the page mention that Lilypond is released under GPLv2 > >> or later? > > > > It's not; lilypond is currently GPLv2. > > The copyright notice in my installed version of Lilypond (2.12 from the > package in Ubuntu Karmic) says 'GPLv2 or (at your option) any later > version'.
Sounds like a mistake in the packaging. COPYING in the source tree says GPLv2. > Has there been a change of policy on this ... ? (... and > isn't there some kind of preference/pressure for GNU projects to either > upgrade to GPLv3 or at least have licensing compatible with it?) Please see the previous lengthy discussions on -devel before asking more questions. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
