On 9/27/09 10:23 AM, "luis jure" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> on 2009-09-27 at 08:02 Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>> The autobeaming behavior (and the documentation) have been fixed in
>> 2.13.4.
>
> i find a regression in 2.13.4 with respect to 2.13.3.
>
> i recently updated to 2.13.3 and i was very happy to see that the
> automatic placing of beams had improved greatly compared to previous
> versions. but in 2.13.4 some things seem to have regressed.
>
> see for example the output of this code in both versions:
>
> \relative c'' {
> d16 d8. d8 d d16 d8. d8 d |
> r16 d8. d8 d r16 d8. d8 d |
> r16 d8.~ d8 d r16 d8.~ d8 d | }
>
>
> in 2.13.4 the dotted eights are beamed with the following eights if (and
> only if) preceded by a rest. this doesn't look well to me, specially
> when the notes are tied.
>
> in 2.13.3 this was correctly sorted out. or i should say, the way _i_
> think it should be sorted out... :-) any other opinions?
We've had a serious discussion about whether eighth note beams should end on
every beat or only on beats 2 and 4.
We came down on the side of ending eighth note beams on 2 and 4, because it
seemed to fit Stone's rules.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel/23515
You can return to the 2.13.3 behavior by adding this line to your file:
\overrideBeamSettings #'Score #'(4 . 4) #'end #'((* . (1 1 1 1))
(32 . (4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4)))
This will cause all beams to break at the beat, except 32 beams will break
at 1/8 notes.
HTH,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
