Hi,
According to Gardner Read: "It is not necessary to repeat the accidental
before a tied note . . . The one exception to this general rule occurs when
the note or notes affected by the accidental and tied over the barline come
at the end of a system or at the bottom of the page. It is helpful to the
performer if the accidental is repeated . . . " (Music Notation, p.131)
I know I have spent a lot of time adding these accidentals in Finale (and
redoing them whenever the layout changed), and I very much appreciate that
2.12.2 takes care of them automatically!
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Joe Neeman <joenee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 13:53 -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> > On Saturday 30 May 2009 10:23:31 pm Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > > > shortest note playing here.")
> > > > (shortest-starter-duration ,ly:moment? "The duration of the
> > > > shortest note that starts here.")
> > > > + (hide-tied-accidental-after-break ,boolean? "If set, an
> accidental
> > > > +that appears on a tied note after a line break will not be
> displayed")
> > > > (side-axis ,number? "If the value is @code{#X} (or
> > > > addr...@hidden@code{0}), the object is placed horizontally next to
> > > > the other object. If the value is @code{#Y} addr...@hidden@code{1},
> it is
> > >
> > > Joe, items in define-grob-properties.scm are sorted alphabetically.
> > > Please move it to the right location.
> >
> > Oops, I had originally named it show-tied-accidental-after-break.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Joe
> >
> > Hi Joe,
> > I have a quick question about this property you've added (which is
> > wonderful, btw):
> > 1) Should tied accidentals after line breaks be suppressed by default?
>
> I don't know; that was the previous default value, so I left it the
> same. I don't mind particularly if someone wants to change it.
>
> > I've looked through some scores, and even thought there's more examples
> > than I thought there would be that show tied accidentals after breaks
> > (mainly orchestral scores, and mainly 20th century pieces from the 70s)
> > it seems in the vast majority of cases they aren't shown.
> >
> > On a related note, I like your original property name above, but I guess
> it
> > would cause problems to change it now.
>
> Again, I won't object if someone else wants to change it (as long as
> there's a convert-ly rule).
>
> Joe
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
