Thanks, fixed! Cheers, - Graham
On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 12:08:43AM +0100, David Pounder wrote: > Very minor nit-pick with the docs (2.13) : > > NR 1.1.1 under relative note entry we are advised that 'if no startpitch is > specified for \relative then c' is assumed. However, this is a deprecated > option ... so its use is discouraged.' > > Later in the section on repeats there is a link to 'usage 1.4 - common errors > - An extra staff appears' where two examples are given that show a repeat > block with no start pitch. > > Not a great problem, but thought I'd mention it in case it hadn't been > noticed before. > > Regards, > > David Pounder > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
