On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Kieren MacMillan < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all, > > I'm hoping to show a Schenker graph example on my lecture tour next week, > but I find <http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=501> unnecessarily complex > — it ends up [to my eye] looking like far more work, and way scarier, than > doing it in Finale (which I did a bunch of in my day, hating every step of > the way). > > Hence the attached simplified/improved code file, at least as far as I've > gotten it in an hour or so. > > I'm really just looking for early/mid-stream criticisms of my > approaches/techniques, so that I end up with the best output — eventually, I > want to have a schenker.ly file for \include purposes (to be available > w/Lily, if appropriate), enabling the simplest possible "front-end" coding > requirements. > > Any hints/help would be appreciated! > > Cheers, > Kieren. > > I like it, Kieren. This might help me sell some of my theory colleagues on the advantages of Lilypond. Jon -- Jonathan Kulp http://www.jonathankulp.com
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
