Dear Members, a while ago I discussed with Neil (thanks again!) th alignment of the figured-bass-items:
for illustration, see the attached examples: _default: as it is programmed in 2.12: here, the combination of accidentals and numbers work well, but if one uses the accidental solely (i.e. the third is changed) a small accidental makes diffuculties in reading _fontsize_0: with the changed font-size in the translation-functions: changed fontsize causes unexpected results regarding to the y-position of numbers with accidentals especially in combination with the natural-sign _definition_changed: with Neils suggestion to solve the alignment-problem: the y-position of accidentals with numbers now work perfect; in addition, from the state of practice, it would be great if anyone has an idea to solve the following: if one uses the accidental solely (see above) the y-position is different (clearly seen if extenders are used); is there a way to handle accidentals eqal to the numbers (in respect to the y-position) if they are used solely? thanks and best regards, Christian http://old.nabble.com/file/p26267481/test_fig_bass_default.pdf test_fig_bass_default.pdf http://old.nabble.com/file/p26267481/test_fig_bass_fontsize_0.pdf test_fig_bass_fontsize_0.pdf http://old.nabble.com/file/p26267481/test_fig_bass_definition_changed.pdf test_fig_bass_definition_changed.pdf -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Figured-Bass-Alignment---follow-up-tp26267481p26267481.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
