Graham wrote: > > For the record, **I have never recommended that somebody use > lilypond**. When meeting a technically-oriented composer, > especially one working on algorithmic music, I might suggest that > they should check it out. But I think the original poster was > entirely justified in switching back to Finale. > > That's why I cringe a bit whenever I hear people proudly > announcing that they advertized lilypond to meeting X or > conference Y. >
I'm surprised. What about the beautiful output and flexibility? If they don't like the learning curve, what's the loss? For me, I only use it for stuff that doesn't require much, if any, tweaking, but from the gist of what I read on the user list, maybe I'm in the minority. Tim Reeves _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
